By: jack
+1000 Basically you get a compact D200 with superior AF, Auto WB, high ISO, and AE. The only thing you are missing is ease of access to advanced modes (somewhat addressed here) and lack of shallow dof...
View ArticleBy: tony T
Tthat is one freaking ugly ass camera…perfect to hang around the necks of ugly people.
View ArticleBy: dalia
the lx5 is not interchangable lens wise, hes basically saying that the V2 is so damn ugly he prefers a pano fixed lens PS camera instead, regardless of whatever. nothing can save that V2 POS, not even...
View ArticleBy: Jan Toude
Nikon 1 V1 is perhaps a nice camera, but Olympus OM-D E-M5 is much better overall, IMHO.
View ArticleBy: Jorge
@grant torres: @dalia Thank you. My LX5 is not an interchangeable lens camera. It is a fantastic tool that is with me everyday. I’m sitting here in the hospital where I’ve been since last Saturday...
View ArticleBy: Alex
Other comments to attest my previous posts regarding DOF on Nikon1 vs Fx : - Photozone says the equivalent DOF of the Nikon 1 lenses at f/4.5 is f/12 on Fx => 3ev to compensate with ISO. If your are...
View ArticleBy: Fred
True, though most times many women will not “wear” a bag more than once. Women are more likely to wear clothes and carry bags
View ArticleBy: Z
Hate it that it can only use proprietary SB-N5 or SB-N7 flashes … would have liked to use a SB 400 … dang …
View ArticleBy: Allen W.
Aimless simply said ” A smaller sensor is better for a full auto type shooter that doesn’t understand DOF and aperture” which IMO is not an inappropriate opinion to express. He/she did NOT say that was...
View ArticleBy: Allen W.
Visually I like it. Fugly can be beautiful if it is also functional. Like the earlier A-10 example.
View ArticleBy: Pablo Ricasso
The price of Nikon’s success is that former Canon snobs have migrated here to dispense with their douche bagishness.
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....